Articles

 Back to Home Page

This page contains a lot of words. Please allow it to fully load before making a selection. Articles that have been published are indicated.

 

 

Canada Pension Plan Strategies                                                       A guide to maximizing your benefits. (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … Summer 2005)

Home-Brewed Enjoyment                                                                The joys of making wine and beer at home. (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … March 2006)

A Taxing Situation                                                                             Oh yes, we do pay taxes in Canada. How much depends on where you live.

A Little Piece of Canadiana                                                             A Visit to the Tunnels of Moose Jaw. (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … Fall 2005)

Medical Expenses and Your Tax Return                                         A guide to claiming medical expenses on your tax return. (CARP 50Plus magazine … Feb 2004, Lifestyles 55+ magazine … Spring 2005)

Hole Handicapping                                                                            Allocating handicap strokes to golf holes. (Inside Golf magazine … May 2004, Lifestyles 55+ magazine Spring 2005)

Let It Snow                                                                                        The pros and cons of buying a snowblower. (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … Winter 2005)

Donor Beware - Donations and Tax Shelter Arrangements           If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … January 2006)

Moving Expenses and Your Tax Return                                          A guide to claiming moving expenses on your tax return.

The Disability Amount and your Tax Return                                  A guide to claiming the disability amount on your tax return.

The Best Darn Golf Tip You'll Ever Get                                         How fit are you to play this game, and how fit should you be? (Lifestyles 55+ magazine … March 2006)

The "Squeeze"                                                                                  Caregiver, and family issues. How are you doing? Are you ready?

Duffer Chronicles                                                                              "Yes Virginia, there really is a Golf God … Sorta" (Lifestyles 55+ magazine May/June  2006)

 

 

Donor Beware

Donations and Tax Shelter Arrangements

 

As concerned Canadians, many of us donate each year to causes that we think are worthy of our support. These donations can either be money, or in-kind (something other than money). Donating items to a charity, such as art, computers, and prescription drugs is a legitimate way of making a charitable donation. We need to be aware, however, that certain donation arrangements are considered by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to be tax shelters, and may be challenged.

Many of us have read about, or heard advertisements for, donation arrangements whereby taxpayers can invest in acquisitions to be gifted as charities. These arrangements allow a taxpayer to buy (without taking possession of) a quantity of items at a bargain basement price. The items are appraised and donated to a registered charity. The charity then provides the taxpayer with a tax receipt based on the items' appraised value. This appraised value is considerably higher than what was paid for the donated items, resulting in an income tax credit for the taxpayer that is greater than the price paid.

The government has systematically attacked tax shelters in recent years. The definition of a tax shelter in the Income Tax Act was amended in 2003 to include any property or gifting arrangement for which a promoter represents that an investor can claim deductions or credits which equal or exceed the cost of the property less certain benefits within a four year period. As a result of this amendment, the CRA will generally be suspicious of any arrangement, including gifting trust arrangements, leveraged cash donations, and buy-low, donate-high arrangements, that allow taxpayers to obtain a tax advantage in excess of the donation amount. They will disallow or adjust claims where they find that the donation was not a true gift, or that the value of the donated property was inflated.

If you are considering making an in-kind donation to a charity, you should be aware that you could be challenged on transactions that have one or more of the following characteristics:

·      The advertised arrangements promise to sell items (such as art, software, or pharmaceuticals) to taxpayers that will be donated immediately to selected charities for tax receipts that are much higher than what the person paid;

·      The appraiser is not acting independently of the promoters or sellers of the arrangement or the charities involved;

·      The fair market value seems too high;

·        The arrangement involves a loan where it's unlikely the person has to repay the loan because the lender's recourse to collect is limited, or the provision to settle the loan is by way of something other than cash payment from the taxpayer.

This is not to say that all donation arrangements will be challenged. There are many in-kind donation arrangements that are acceptable to the CRA. If, however, the arrangement you are considering includes some or all of the characteristics indicted above, you might want to take the following precautions:

·        Be wary of any arrangement where you do not get to see the property, or the charity has been pre-selected for you;

·        Request confirmation directly from the recipient charity, independent of the promoter that it has agreed to receive the property and that it will exercise due diligence regarding the valuation of the property;

·        Review the valuation or appraisal report. The report should indicate the professional appraiser is knowledgeable about the property and the market activity at the time of the donation;

·        Ensure that the appraiser is a qualified and independent party who is not connected to the promoters or sellers of the donation. Generally, membership in a professional association is a good indication of an appraiser's qualifications;

·        Be aware that even if the arrangement is registered and has a tax shelter number, this does not guarantee that taxpayers will receive the proposed tax benefits;

·        Before signing anything, obtain independent legal, and tax advice.

As a taxpayer, you are responsible for the information on your tax returns. Although most tax returns are assessed as filed, the CRA generally has three years from the date of assessment to reassess taxpayers. The fact that investors in some of these tax shelter donation arrangements have not been reassessed should not be interpreted as the CRA's acceptance of the arrangement. Such audits may take more than one year to complete.

In closing I would remind you of the old maxim, "If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is."

 

Back To Top

Duffer Chronicles

"Yes Virginia, There Really is a Golf God, … Sorta"

 

I played golf today, and really enjoyed myself. I got a little exercise, had a good time with my buddies, and didn't have to pay for the beer after the game. Actually, I usually feel pretty good about golf these days, even when I do have to buy the beer. I haven't been in the nineties now for over a year, and the game has become fun again.

I've been hooked on golf since I was a kid. That's a long time, and a lot of games ago. Like many who play this game, I'm obsessed with it. A few years ago, a Royal Canadian Golf Association survey indicated that there were approximately five million golfers in Canada who played an average of fifteen rounds per year. That's seventy five million rounds of golf a year folks, and that's a lot of obsession.

As a teen-ager, I worked my summers as a caddy at a posh golf course just outside of Montreal. Being around golfers all the time taught me a lot about the game, both good and bad. I became pretty good at it, and even managed to win a few caddy tournaments. I left that all behind when I finished school, and for the next thirty-odd years, career and family commitments restricted my golf to ten to fifteen games a year. My game wasn't very good, but I still loved to get out.

I was fortunate enough to be able to semi-retire in my early-fifties, and got serious about the game again. I joined a golf club, took some lessons, and tried to find the swing that I had left back in Montreal many years before. Sure enough, my game came around, and for the next three or four years, I really enjoyed myself. Visions of bigger and better things danced in my head.

Then, somehow, somewhere, with no warning, I lost it. Something changed, and I didn't know what it was. My swing didn't feel any different, but my ball was consistently landing thirty to forty yards shorter than it used to, and too often off the fairway. At first, I thought I was just going through a dry spell. I practiced more. I took more lessons. Nothing worked. The game that I had been taking for granted was gone. Golf had become more frustration than fun. I suffered this agony for five more years before it finally sunk in that my game had probably gone to the same place as my younger, stronger, and more flexible body. I either had to quit the game, or lower my expectations. I chose the latter and kept playing (obsession), but it was never the same. Bad golf isn't nearly as much fun.

I'm not sure exactly when it all changed for me, but it was about a year ago. I was surfing the net one day, when I stumbled onto a web site called "SortaGolf", http://sortagolf.manilasites.com. This site, operated by the SortaGolf Association (SGA), is dedicated to recreational golfers around the world. The SGA's position is that since 95 percent of golfers play for recreation only, and since very few of them follow all the rules all the time, a new, structured approach to the recreational game is needed. They have developed a Golfer's Bill Of Rights that includes several revolutionary amendments to the established 'Rules of Golf. These amendments offer the opportunity for recreational golfers to all cheat the same way, thereby evening the playing field.

What a revelation … rules for cheating. This was ground breaking philosophy, and I knew it was going to change the way I approached the game. Here are a few of the SGA's rule amendments:

  • One Mulligan per Round.

Golfers have to manage a lot of stress. One Mulligan per round, from the tee box on any hole provides a stress-reducing cushion, thereby leading to better performance.

  • Always Improve Your Lie.

This will give you the best possible chance to play your best golf. There is no good reason to be penalized by poor course maintenance, sadistically placed trees, or the randomness of nature.

  • Inside The Leather is “Good”.

"SortaGolf" recognizes the "GIMME", and reaffirms this time-tested practice.

  • One-In/One-Out Principle.

The stroke and distance rules of golf are excessively punitive. "SortaGolf" employs the one-in / one-out principle. If you hit your ball out of bounds, it's one stroke in, and one stroke (penalty) out, the same as a hazard.

  • Any Ball Found is Your Ball.

Nothing is more maddening than searching for a ball that you have hit, and finding five balls, none of which are yours. In "SortaGolf", possession is 9/10 of the law. Any ball you find is deemed yours, free of penalty. Make sure though, that the ball you claim to be yours does not belong to another member of your group.

  • Double Bogey is Max.

Why risk shooting a score far in excess of your ability? Today's golf courses are fraught with danger, and it is easy to blow up your score on one or more holes, thereby sacrificing an otherwise stellar round.

 

So that's it. That's my new game. I don't even feel like I've betrayed the ancient game. I know I'm not playing real golf. I'm playing "SortaGolf", and I'm enjoying myself again for the first time in years. It wasn't hard to convince my golfing buddies that this should be their game too. We can't post our scores, and a few of the purists around the club are upset with us, but that's their problem, not ours. I haven't heard an angry rant, or seen a golf club flying through the air for over a year now. We’re having some fun, getting some exercise, and isn't that really what it's supposed to be all about?

 

 

Back To Top

 

A Taxing Situation

 

Most Canadians agree that we pay a lot of taxes. To name a few, there is federal income tax, provincial income tax, sales tax, the GST, municipal taxes, as well as government fees and levies for just about everything that is fun and interesting to do. Whether or not we agree with how these tax dollars are spent, we do not have a choice when it comes to paying taxes, and so we do. This discussion looks at the provincial income tax we must pay, and some of the differences in approach that our provincial leaders have taken to get their fair share of the tax pie.

The tax system in Canada is based on a system of self-assessment. This system requires each of us to determine our tax liability by calculating our tax payable and comparing that amount with any tax we have already paid. . Each year in late winter and early spring, we gather our records and slips, sharpen our pencils, and do whatever we can to minimize this amount.

For many years, all provinces and territories, with the exception of Quebec, which administers its own tax system, have levied taxes as a percentage of basic federal tax (tax on tax). As of 2002, all the provinces and territories, with the exception of Quebec, have instituted a new tax system that levies personal income tax as a percentage of taxable income. This Tax on Income system (TONI) allows each provincial and territorial government to set its own tax brackets and tax rates, independent of the federal tax system. This has provided these governments with direct control over many features of their income tax system, and greater flexibility to implement policies tailored to provincial and territorial needs. While this new tax system has increased the complexity of preparing an income tax return, it has provided taxpayers with a more accountable system, and made the impact of Provincial / Territorial non-refundable tax credits more transparent to the taxpayer.

What TONI has not done, however, is change the fact that where we live in Canada is a major factor in determining how many tax dollars we must pay. Most of us are aware that there is a difference. Many of us are not aware, however, how much this difference is. This amount can approach 10%, depending on where you live and your income level. For example:

  • If your income is $50,000.00 and you live in Manitoba, the amount of federal and provincial taxes owing is $ 13,225.00. In BC, for the same income, the amount owing is $ 10,920.00, a difference of $ 2,935.00, or 5.87%.
  • If your income is $100,000 and you live in Quebec the amount of federal and provincial taxes owing is $ 36,430.00. In Nunavut, for the same income, the amount owing is $ 26, 596.00, a difference of $ 9,834.00, or 9.83 %.

 

The following table uses 2003 tax figures. It illustrates the estimated Federal and Provincial / Territorial taxes owed on a given income level. These estimates include tax reductions for Federal and Provincial/Territorial Personal Tax Credits, but do not include other low income tax reductions and / or other Provincial / Territorial tax credits.

 

 

Income Level

BC

AB

SK

MB

ON

PQ

NB

NS

PEI

NF

YK

NWT

NVT

$ 25,000

  3,770

  3,910

  4,630

  4,650

  3,800

  5,075

  4,430

  4,500

  4,485

  4,620

  3,975

  3,765

  3,350

$ 50,000

10,920

11,475

12,750

13,225

10,925

14,225

12,830

13,065

12,775

13,475

11,270

11,115

  9,960

$ 75,000

19,475

19,900

21,925

23,125

20,025

25,000

22,650

23,000

22,900

24,000

19,800

19,700

17,850

$ 100,000

29,500

28,900

31,675

33,975

30,875

36,425

33,275

34,000

34,000

35,400

29,300

29,125

26,600

 

 

 

 

 

Back To Top

 

A Little Piece of Canadiana, Underground

 

 

 

Returning from a trip to Winnipeg this summer, my wife Cathy and I decided to overnight in Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan. This city of approximately 36,000 is situated seventy kilometres west of Regina on the Trans-Canada Highway. We had lived there many years ago, and were interested in seeing it again.

We checked into our motel and headed downtown for a walk through the city centre. Many things looked familiar, but it was apparent that Moose Jaw was no longer the sleepy little town we had known in the 1970s. Now in 2005, there is a first class casino, a world-class spa, several great restaurants, some rockin' clubs, a beautiful downtown park, and most, if not all the attributes of other modern Canadian cities.

After enjoying a cappuccino at one of the patio restaurants on Main Street, we entered an interesting looking storefront named ‘Tunnels Central’. Little did we know that over the next two hours we would be taken back to a time in history when Moose Jaw reluctantly provided an underground haven to destitute Chinese immigrants, and to yet another time when the city was known to many as ‘Little Chicago’.

Since 2000, Moose Jaw has hosted a unique tourist attraction known as ‘The Tunnels of Moose Jaw’. It offers visitors the opportunity to partake in two separate underground tours, the ‘Passage to Fortune’ tour, and ‘The Chicago Connection’ tour. Visitors experience firsthand two of the strangest stories in twentieth-century Canadian history.

Chinese immigration to Canada began around 1858 in response to the gold rush in British Columbia. In the 1880's, when the Canadian Pacific Railway was being built approximately 6500 Chinese were brought into the country to help with its construction. When the railway was completed several of them, now unemployed, migrated east from BC, some of them settling in Moose Jaw.

Feelings towards these Chinese immigrants were running strong in Canada in those days. Many Canadians were gripped by the hysteria of the “yellow peril”. They believed that these immigrants, who would work for comparatively little pay, were taking all the good jobs. Ottawa had brought in restrictions on the number of Chinese immigrants that were allowed into the country so as not to take away too many jobs from Canadians. The government even imposed a head tax on every Chinese immigrant. Many of these workers were unable to afford the tax, and in Moose Jaw they went underground to hide from the authorities. Their living quarters were little more than dirt and mortar caves connected by existing steam pipe tunnels. Whole families subsisted in this underground maze for over a generation waiting for the situation to improve. To survive, they worked for food and supplies in the basements and kitchens of above ground laundries and restaurants. The proprietors of these establishments took advantage of the situation by providing access to the tunnels through their basements.

The Passage to Fortune tour chronicles these Chinese immigrants' life in Moose Jaw during the late 1800's and early 1900's. It begins in Mr. Burroughs laundry where you, a newly arrived Chinese ‘coolie’, meet Dawson, the steam engineer. He introduces you to your new life as a pennies-a-day worker in the bowels of the laundry. The next forty-five minutes take you deep into the tunnels, chronicling the working and living conditions of these Chinese people and the daily hardships they were subjected to. The tour is worthy of your time, providing a dramatic glimpse int